Review media for manipulation signals
Share the clip, image, post or quote. Get the observable signals, the benign explanations, and what the original says that the excerpt left out.
- 500 credits included
- No card needed
- Public sources only
The review you get backExample
- Cut at 0:12 removes the conditionOriginal interview foundcontext omitted
- Caption changes the meaningPost text vs originalas observed
- Lighting inconsistent at the edgeVisual cue; alternative: compressionneeds verification
- Metadata and forensic checksNot run — specialist workgap
No fake or authentic verdict — observations, alternatives, and what to verify
What it checks
- The original or fuller source
- The item's own page
- Transcript and metadata where retrievable
- 01Share the itemA link, a file, a quote; where you saw it.
- 02See what is observableSignals with an alternative explanation each; the original compared.
- 03Take it to a personIf the finding goes into a dispute, an analyst can stand behind it.
No deepfake verdict
It surfaces signals and uncertainty; it does not certify anything.
Nobody is identified
No attribution of author, operator or intent from the content.
One item, one review
An item does not change on its own; nothing to schedule.
Does it detect deepfakes?
No. It surfaces observable signals and uncertainties and recommends verification — it does not issue an authenticity verdict.
Will it tell me who made it?
No. It does not attribute origin or intent.
What do I get?
Timestamped observations, possible explanations, gaps, and verification steps.