Compare claims with public evidence
Paste the claims. Each one is checked against public evidence — supported, partly supported, contradicted or insufficient — with the passage that says so.
- 500 credits included
- No card needed
- Public sources only
The comparison you get backExample
- Operating since 2010Registry pagesupported
- 500 employeesCompany site vs registry filingpartly supported
- Offices in five countriesNo public evidence foundinsufficient
- Award in 2025Press release onlyunverified
Every assessment cites the source it rests on
What it checks
- Primary documents and registries
- News and official statements
- The sources you supply
- A specific post or account, on demand
- 01Paste the claimsOne or several; add context and any sources you have.
- 02Evidence, claim by claimSupporting and contradicting passages, with confidence.
- 03Decide what to doIf a claim about you needs a public or legal answer, a person can take it from here.
Bounded, not a verdict
Assessments describe the evidence found, never a person's honesty.
Public sources and yours
Links preserved on every piece of evidence.
Re-check on request
Ask again when the dispute moves; nothing runs on its own.
Is this a fact-check verdict?
No. It's a source-bound comparison with bounded assessments and explicit gaps.
How many claims can I check?
It works best with a bounded set of specific claims.
What sources?
Public sources and any you supply, with links preserved.